Can people train themselves to multitask better?

Research by Clifford Nass at Stanford found that heavy multitaskers were worse at all cognitive tasks measured — including task switching itself — compared to light multitaskers. Practice at multitasking doesn't improve it; it correlates with worse overall cognitive performance.

Isn't single-tasking impractical for people who have many responsibilities?

Single-tasking doesn't mean handling one project to completion before starting another. It means giving each task a dedicated block of undivided attention, then moving to the next. You can manage dozens of responsibilities while single-tasking — you just sequence them rather than interleave them.

Does single-tasking apply to administrative tasks like email?

Yes, but differently. For email, single-tasking means batch-processing it in dedicated windows rather than checking it continuously. You're still single-tasking — your task is 'process email' — but you've batched many small tasks into one focused block.

What tools help with single-tasking?

Time blocking apps (today), website blockers (Cold Turkey, Freedom), focus modes (iOS, macOS, Android), physical environment changes (headphones, private workspace), and communication tools with asynchronous defaults all support single-tasking in different ways.

Single-tasking: why doing one thing at a time is not inefficiency

Single-tasking is the practice of focusing on one task at a time. Research consistently shows it outperforms multitasking for quality, speed, and cognitive health.

What is single-tasking and why does it contradict our instincts?

Single-tasking is the practice of working on one task at a time with full attention, completing or deliberately pausing it before switching to the next. It contradicts two deeply held intuitions about productivity: that more simultaneous activity equals more output, and that being always-available and instantly responsive signals professionalism. Both intuitions are empirically wrong. Cognitive science has consistently shown for 30 years that humans don't actually multitask — we rapidly switch attention between tasks while experiencing the illusion of simultaneity. The output of this 'switching' is lower quality, slower, and more error-prone than sequential single-task completion. Single-tasking produces better work, not less of it.

The neuroscience behind single-tasking

The prefrontal cortex — the brain region responsible for complex reasoning and decision-making — operates as a bottleneck. It cannot process two cognitively demanding inputs simultaneously; it queues them sequentially. What we call multitasking is actually rapid sequential switching, governed by the prefrontal cortex's attention-shifting mechanism. Earl Miller, an MIT neuroscientist, has shown using electrical recording that neurons in the prefrontal cortex encode only one task at a time. Attempting to split this encoding between two tasks produces degraded encoding for both. This isn't willpower or discipline — it's hardware. Single-tasking works because it matches how the brain is architecturally designed to process complex work.

How to single-task in a world designed for multitasking

Single-tasking requires structural changes to the working environment, not just intentions. The most effective interventions: close all applications not needed for the current task (every notification is a pull toward a different task). Use website blockers during focus sessions to remove the temptation to switch. Set a defined, written task statement before starting — 'finish the abstract for the paper' — so the brain has a clear target to hold. Time-block your work so each period has a single designated task type. Use visible indicators (headphones, status on Slack, physical signage) to reduce external interruptions. These structural changes are necessary because motivation alone cannot override the brain's evolved sensitivity to novel stimuli.

Single-tasking and work quality

The quality argument for single-tasking is as strong as the efficiency argument. Errors in complex cognitive work — a missed edge case in code, a logical flaw in a document, a misread data point in an analysis — are disproportionately introduced during task switching rather than during sustained attention. When you're fully present on a single task, your working memory holds the relevant context continuously, which enables you to catch inconsistencies and maintain conceptual coherence that fragmented attention misses. For work where quality mistakes have significant downstream costs — engineering, medicine, legal work, financial analysis — single-tasking isn't a preference, it's a professional standard.

Frequently asked questions