today vs Motion: the case for planning your own day vs. letting AI plan it

today
Calm daily planner
Time blocks, focus, commitments, reflection
vs
Motion
an AI-powered calendar and task manager that automatically schedules your tasks into available time slots

What Motion and today are fundamentally doing

Motion is an AI-powered calendar that automatically schedules your tasks and meetings into available time slots, optimizing for deadlines and priorities. You input tasks and their requirements; Motion fills your calendar. Today takes the opposite approach: you create each time block intentionally, decide the day's outcome, and plan around your calendar rather than having the calendar planned for you. The philosophical difference is significant — Motion automates planning decisions to save time; today treats planning decisions as deliberate cognitive acts that shape how you work, not overhead to eliminate.

What Motion does better than today

Motion excels at deadline-driven scheduling: if you have multiple tasks with hard deadlines across multiple projects, Motion's AI optimization ensures the most important things get time without you having to manually calculate priority and sequence. For users managing complex project portfolios with many interdependencies and tight deadlines, automatic scheduling reduces the cognitive overhead of capacity planning significantly. Motion also handles rescheduling automatically when meetings run over or new tasks arrive — it adjusts the rest of the day's plan rather than requiring you to manually do so.

What today does better than Motion

Today's manual planning creates something Motion's automation can't: intentional commitment to your day's direction. When you choose your daily outcome and create each block deliberately, you're making an explicit cognitive investment in the day's direction. That investment changes how you work — you're executing a plan you made, not following a schedule an algorithm generated. Today also tracks how your day actually went (session logs, energy data, reflection) in a way that Motion doesn't, creating a feedback loop for continuous improvement. For users whose primary challenge is focus and intentionality rather than deadline complexity, today's deliberate approach produces better results.

Which tool fits which type of worker

Motion works best for deadline-dense roles: project managers coordinating many deliverables, attorneys managing case deadlines, operations managers with complex task dependencies. Today works best for deep-work-centric roles: software engineers, writers, researchers, and anyone whose primary challenge is protecting focused time for cognitively demanding work. Many Motion users report that the AI scheduling is accurate but the planned day feels foreign — you didn't choose the sequence, so following it feels less like executing your own plan and more like following someone else's instructions. That psychological ownership of the plan matters for execution quality.

Frequently asked questions